The X-Files: I Want to Believe, The Mothman Prophecies, Young@Heart
X-Files: I Want to Believe, The
[ 2 stars out of 4 ]
I’m not an avid fan of “The X-Files” (but a fan nonetheless) mainly because I haven’t seen many episodes from the later seasons. But I know the importance of Fox Mulder (David Duchovny) and Dr. Dana Scully’s (Gillian Anderson) relationship pertaining to the overall story arc. Although most of the time one believes and one doubts, things get really interesting and entertaining when both characters touch the gray area. After eight years, I think Duchovny and Anderson still got it but the writing isn’t as strong so the characters feel a little different. Watching this picture is like watching a good (but not great) episode of “The X-Files” TV show. It’s another mystery-of-the-week kind of story that doesn’t much contribute to the infamous alien mythology. I wish the filmmakeres have decided to tackle that mythology instead because there are so much unanswered questions in the series finale. I found adding Amanda Peet and Xzibit as FBI agents to be refreshing because they reminded me of how much Mulder and Scully have evolved over the years. Billy Connolly as a psychic was nothing impressive but he was still mysterious and I wanted to know much about his character. One of my biggest problems with the film is that Duchovny wasn’t given enough material to work with in order for the audiences to understand him that much more. Most of the time, we see him moping and believing in the paranormal… and that’s pretty much it. But I was glad that Anderson was able to play various emotions whether it comes to dealing with the paranormal or science. As for the conclusion of the film, although shocking in its own right, the writers could’ve done something that could last in people’s heads after the credits ended. “The X-Files: I Want to Believe” wants to me to believe that the filmmakers will make another film to possibly bring back every effective element the TV show had to prove to moviegoers how powerful (and astute) the series can be.
Mothman Prophecies, The
[ 2 stars out of 4 ]
This film was supposedly based on a true story but there were many things about it that were so unbelievable, it was borderline science fiction. Still, I managed to focus on the film’s skill to entertain and effectiveness to thrill rather than its validity. The story kind of reminded me of a stand alone episode of “The X-Files” to the point where I expected Mulder and Scully to eventually appear on screen to help Richard Gere and Laura Linney solve the mystery. There were many questions that were raised, particularly during the first half, but almost none of them were ever answered clearly. It’s as if the filmmakers decided to put together one creepy scene after another without adding up to anything concrete. So, I would definitely say that there’s no reason for this picture to run for two hours. Nonetheless, there were two standout scenes for me: the phone call right before the film’s first hour and the disaster in the end. Other than those two scenes, I found the rest to be the kinds of scenes that can be seen in other thrillers. I did like the perfomances from Gere and Linney, but I wish Debra Messing had more things to do other than be happy or sad. What this film excelled in was the bleak atmosphere that gave me goosebumps from time to time. Ultimately, I won’t recommend this picture to anyone with short attention spans and to those who are not comfortable with unclear answers.
Young@Heart
[ 3 stars out of 4 ]
“I will never complain about being too old or being too tired anymore,” says one of the audiences after one of the Young at Heart Chorus concerts. That phrase sums up the entire documentary because we get to see a group of senior citizens, whose ages average about 80 years, singing, dancing, and having fun as if age isn’t at all a factor. I really enjoyed this picture because the subject is new to me so I was very interested in what insights it has to offer. All the happy singing and dancing aside, we also got a look at some of the members’ failing health. But instead of feeling depressed about their situation they still look forward to going back to perform again. It made me wonder whether what keeps them alive is the hope of rehearsing with their friends the next day. I was amazed by some of the Young at Heart Chorus’ renditions of certain songs like Coldplay’s “Fix You” and “Schizophrenia” by Sonic Youth. They made it their own without actually leaving the song’s catchiness and the original artists’ messages. This film also has important advice regarding teamwork, perserverance, and retaining a sense of humor. Ten minutes into the picture, I wanted to meet the members of the choir because they seem so energetic and interesting, unlike some young people I know. This movie also reminded me of my late grandfather because he was always had a positive outlook about everything. It made me wish that when I turn 80 I could be as young at heart as the members of the chorus.
Rogue, La Vie en Rose, Pineapple Express
Rogue (2008)
[ 2 stars out of 4 ]
I decided to see this film for two reasons: Michael Vartan (due to the fact that “Alias” is one of my favorite TV shows and he made the show that much better) and the giant crocodile that eats people. I wanted to experience suspense and see gore–I got exactly what I wanted. This is a typical horror creature film in such a way that the first thirty minutes has nothing going on except show some fantastic views of the setting. Despite of it being cliché, the formula works for me because it leaves room to establish the characters that we’re supposed to care about prior to the crocodile’s feast. In that respect, even though it hits and misses, I thought the film did a mediocre job. Things quickly picked up when the Radha Mitchell and her group of tourists were attacked by the giant crocodile. They were trapped in a little island where, as each minute passes by, the tide gets higher and higher. They know they have to get out of there but the predicament lies in the crocodile patrolling the waters. I thought all the actors did a pretty good job freaking out and the execution of some ideas (such as the rope scene) hones in on the idea of what people are willing to do in order to save themselves. As for the final battle between a character and the scary giant crocodile, it was thrilling but it was very funny at the same time because it was so ridiculous. It’s almost as if the filmmakers just went for it and reflected the B-movies of the 1980′s. The risks paid off because they tell the audience that the filmmakers weren’t taking the picture too seriously and the audiences shouldn’t either. Overall, I was interested while watching this movie but I thought it could have been a lot better if Sam Worthington was in it a lot more. He provided complexity and a little bit of heart, which the film sort of lacked.
Vie en Rose, La (2007)
[ 2 stars out of 4 ]
I almost want to give this picture a solid recommendation due to its mesmerizing second half, but I can’t find it in my heart to forgive the extremely slow and uneven first half. When Marion Cotillard (who played Edith Piaf) won the Oscar for Best Actress, I was extremely frustrated with the Academy because I expected Julie Christie to win for playing a woman who was ravaged by Alzheimer’s disease in “Away from Her.” But after watching some of Cotillard’s other films (like “Big Fish”), including “La Vie en Rose,” I realized how much she had to transform in order to play Piaf. I was really impressed because she almost had to carry the entire film by herself. I don’t know if it’s the characters or just the style of filmmaking that turned me off. This film does not have a typical American style biopic because it has many scenes that didn’t help to drive the story forward. Sometimes, the audiences are subjected to see scenes that are designed to muster some sort of an emotion and nothing else. Paif also didn’t click with me because she was a diva. One would think that her traumatic childhood would keep her grounded more than anything else. But that isn’t exactly the filmmakers’ fault because they were only trying to tell the story of what really happened. On other fronts, it was also nice to see Gérard Depardieu even for just a little bit. I wish he was on screen for a lot longer because his presence made the movie have some sort of pop. This film’s detached feel certainly backfired for me. If the second half had been the entire film, I would’ve been perfectly happy because it managed to show some heart. For a film that’s about two hours and twenty minutes, one would think that the film would have more substance. For an excellent biopic, I’d recommend “The Aviator” instead.
Pineapple Express
[ 2 stars out of 4 ]
I didn’t expect much from this film because I heard about the mixed reviews it received but I did watch it with an open mind. There were some funny scenes but there weren’t enough of them to make the film a stand-out from most stoner comedies out there. Seth Rogen is funny as usual but I didn’t find his acting particularly different from “Superbad” and “Knocked Up.” I felt like he’s the kind of guy who could’ve done more to make the film a bit edgier and politically incorrect… but didn’t. The real star here is James Franco. I didn’t expect him to be so good as a pot head but he nailed the character right on the head. I knew some guys in college who acted and talked like him. Despite the archetypical druggie he’s playing, I found Franco captivating whenever I’d look at him in the eyes. I found some sort of sparkle in his eyes that reminded me that he’s only playing a character which, strangely enough, I found to be a great thing. (Most of the time, I don’t like it when I notice that an actor is merely acting.) There’s nothing much to say about this film because nothing much happened, other than the usual ruckus audiences are expecting to see in stoner comedies. But I must mention that I wish Judd Apatow should consider not putting his name in every movie that comes out because his name is pretty much synonymous with “must watch with high expectations.” I wish this picture would’ve strived for something more because it’s hard not to notice its talented actors not optimizing their potential.
Purple Violets, Reprise, Married Life
Purple Violets
[ 4 stars out of 4 ]
It’s funny because I’ve always seen Selma Blair as the naive girl who Sarah Michelle Gellar wanted to destroy in “Cruel Intentions” regardless of how many films I’ve seen her star in. This one is the first starring role that convinced me that Blair can be a great actress. I completely bought the quirks that comes along with her character, the things she’s going through, and where she could possibly be heading. Once this film, directed by the always engrossing Edward Burns, started I couldn’t stop watching it because all the actors have a certain energy that made me want to know more. Patrick Wilson gives another great performance as the romantic writer happens to have a certain boyish look but stuck in a relationship with someone who’s extremely emotionally unstable (played by Elizabeth Reaser). Reaser’s massive bursts of anger made me laugh out loud but at the same time felt sorry for Wilson because he appeared to be somewhat emasculated in those scenes. I’ve always loved Debra Messing from “Will & Grace” and her other films like “The Wedding Date,” but I’ve never seen her so scathing as she was in this little gem of a picture. I enjoyed the little side story between Messing and Burns because they are so opposite in personalities that it was interesting to see them interact. This is undoubtedly a romantic comedy but as I was watching it, I felt like it was a tier higher than that. The film’s core is about deeply wounded thirtysomethings who want to achieve happiness but cannot quite get there because they are not happy with themselves. I was really invested with the characters and more than half of the time, I wish I knew these people not only to offer them advice but also learn from them. This movie reminded me of high school when I had all the time in the world to just… write. It made me wish that there were more hours in the day so I could just sit down even for just an hour or two to write about anything and everything. I thought this film was funny and sad with just the right pacing, but above all, it’s honest like a good piece of literature.
Reprise (2006)
[ 3 stars out of 4 ]
I expected character depth from this film but I didn’t expect for it to look and feel low-key. Luckily, I’ve grown to appreciate low-key pictures over the years and I found it beautiful in “Reprise.” A fellow critic on Netflix claims that this movie is more for advance foreign film students because, on top of the language barrier (the whole film is spoken in Norwegian), it’s extremely difficult to relate to the characters. I disagree because even though the characters may seem like literary snobs on the outside (pretty much all they do is hang out with friends, hang out with their girlfriends and write), something deep inside them is relatable. Even though they feel jubilant whenever they experience success and get jealous when someone else is in the spotlight, the group of friends ultimately care for one another. I was impressed with Anders Danielsen Lie (who plays Phillip) and Espen Klouman-Høiner (who plays Erik) because I completely believed that they built a true friendship that started when they were children. They push each other to go on, whether it comes to writing or living life, to keep going… but at the same time they hinder each other despite their best intentions. I found the bleak look of the film to be thoroughly engaging because it added to the realism of the picture. Joachim Trier, the director, carefully molded the characters but still had time to enhance the overall feel of the film by adding voice overs and scenes that might have or could have happened. This may not be the most accessible film but what it has going for it are strong characterization and a solid medium that show the hurdles that artistic people in their twenties might face.
Married Life (2007)
[ 2 stars out of 4 ]
This picture reminded me a whole lot of “Margot at the Wedding” because they are both dark comedies with unrealized potential. There were definitely some exciting parts, such as when Chris Cooper decides and acts upon killing Patricia Clarkson, but at the same time the movie is slowed down by the romance between Pierce Brosnan and Rachel McAdams. I almost hate saying that this film is mediocre because the acting here is solid and multilayered, especially from McAdams. She lights up the screen whenever she’s in a scene which reminded me of movie stars from the 1950′s. I think I would’ve cared more about the characters if the connections between them are a lot stronger. Instead, I wanted some of the characters to suffer because of their selfishness and stupidity. I admired the film’s fusion of marriage drama and noir, which definitely summons Woody Allen’s “Match Point” but a much weaker version. I did like the film’s theme of whether it’s right to build a life of happiness on someone else’s misery. Like a well-writter paper, there were several scenes that support each side. I think if this film would’ve pushed itself a bit further like toning down the barely explored romantic angle between Brosnan and McAdams, this would have been a leaner and meaner picture. I also would’ve liked to see the true strength of Brosnan and Cooper’s friendship. Overall, this is a slow picture but isn’t necessarily a bad one. I’d recommend it to those who are craving something a little different but still somewhat mainstream.
Stephen King’s It, King Corn, The Diving Bell and the Butterfly
Stephen King’s It
[ 2 stars out of 4 ]
I haven’t read the book prior to watching this film so I can’t compare consistencies between the two media. However, it doesn’t change the fact that I was extremely disappointed by this picture/mini-series. From friends and reviews online, I’ve been informed that this is a pretty scary flick. I was excited to rent it because I remember watching a scene or two when I was about eleven years old and I thought it was creepy so I immediately changed the channel. But from watching “It” from beginning to end, it was very underwhelming. The thought the first half was pretty good, especially the child actors. Some standouts include Seth Green, Brandon Crane, and the late Jonathan Brandis. I believed that they were being terrified by Pennywise (played by Tim Curry) because it’s natural for children to be scared of many things. Things went downhill quickly during the second half when the story focuses on the adults. It’s not like I didn’t like the late John Ritter, Annette O’Toole, Tim Reid and Richard Thomas. In fact, they’re all pretty good with some occassional lame dialogue. It’s just that I didn’t believe any of them had chemistry together. The only scene that I thought was pretty brilliant during the second half was when O’Toole’s character visited her old house and finds out that an old lady lives there. That sequence was pretty scary. The ending was really lame and just thinking about it makes me laugh more than anything. I’ve seen better pictures out there about children’s fears being repersonified when they were adults. This one is imaginative but unimpressive.
King Corn
[ 3 stars out of 4 ]
I can’t say all the information that were presented in this picture were new to me but there were definitely some shocking facts that I didn’t know or have forgotten about. I want to start off with the negatives. One of the main reasons why this documentary is less effective than it should have been is that Aaron Woolf, the director, spent too much time setting up everything–such as how the two friends that the audiences will follow throughout the picture, Ian Cheney and Curt Ellis, planted an acre of corn in Iowa. If they had cut off about twenty minutes from those scenes (like the two playing catch and sleeping with their crops), I think Woolf would have had more room for more in-depth interviews from scholars about the impacts of high fructose diets or presenting alternatives in order to avoid high fructose foods. Instead, the film merely glides over some of the most important topics that are extremely relevant in our society. It was definitely frustrating for me because I major in Biology and I wanted to know more about the issues that they were trying to tackle. However, I did like the way the film linked the relationship among what’s grown in the ground, the economy, and health issues. In a way, this film reminded me of “Super Size Me” because its technique involved shocking statistics and humor. I also liked the way that it didn’t write off the treatment of animals just to meet people’s demand for meat. The film is a little too short (it’s only about an hour and thirty minutes long) and I would’ve liked to see regular people being interviewed to show what they know (or what they don’t know) about the role of corn in pretty much everything we eat. That way, it will show this film’s relevance and urgency. I like documentaries that read like a thesis paper: clear, organized, and insightful. And if I were to treat this like a paper, it doesn’t deserve an “A” grade because most of the time it was stuck on the surface of things. I would give it a “B+” for hitting some strong points but not completely delivering its full potential.
Diving Bell and the Butterfly, The
[ 4 stars out of 4 ]
I’m not going to deny that I didn’t shed a tear while watching this touching film. From the first scene to the last, I was completely into it because the story is very human and the way the story unfolded is far from predictable. Julian Schnabel, the director, took many risks that actually paid off: one is placing the audience into the main character’s body right from the very beginning. By doing that, we are immediately able to feel and hear what the protagonist wants to express whether we want to or not. Mathieu Amalric who plays Jean-Dominique Bauby impressed me so much. I thought that Amalric really was paralyzed and it hurts just to look at his condition. This is the first time I’ve heard of Locked-In Syndrome, where the person is aware of everything that’s going on around him but he is completely paralyzed. (That will officially go under one of the things I most fear will happen to me.) The movie is surprisingly poetic and has comedic moments despite the tragedy that’s unfolding before the audience. In a span of just under two hours, we are able to understand, if not merely glimpse, what has happened during and before Bauby had a massive stroke that led him into a vegetative state. From an emotional point of view, this film is nothing short of devastating; from an artistic point of view, I admired its use of awkward camera angles, blurry perspectives, and the story’s fluidity. I haven’t seen a film in a while that has inspired me to not take things for granted.
Dennis the Menace, Raising Victor Vargas, Roger & Me
Dennis the Menace
[ 3 stars out of 4 ]
This is one of those movies that I watched pretty much every day when I was about six years old, so I was glad to have stumbled over it on TV on a very noneventful day. Even though I haven’t seen this picture in over ten years, I was surprised to have remembered some of the dialogues to a tee, especially the witty exchanges between Dennis (Mason Gamble) and Mr. Wilson (Walter Matthau). I was also very amused with Dennis’ friends: Margaret (Amy Sakasitz) and Joey (Kellen Hathaway). Even though they’re little kids and have so much energy, they know just how much to give without crossing that line of disbelief. The movie feels very comic strip with a touch of slapstick comedy. In most films, such a style isn’t my cup of tea but that it’s exactly why I enjoyed this film so much; it’s about children which means accidents and slaptick are not apart from them. The movie is consistently very funny up until Dennis meets Switchblade Sam, the robber and villain of the story, played by a barely recognizable Christopher Lloyd. I thought a villain wasn’t necessary to the story because not only did it make the movie longer (and slow down a bit), it took away some time from the budding relationship between Dennis and Mr. Wilson. I would also like to note Joan Plowright for playing Martha Wilson with such sweetness. I seriously wanted her to be my grandmother. This movie will always have a place in my heart because it was one of the first American movies I’ve seen. When I was younger, I didn’t understand what the characters were saying (English isn’t my first language). But watching it again made me appreciate it that much more not only because I understood the film’s dialogue but that I was able to sense some of the more adult themes and undertones. “Dennis the Menace” is great fun but wouldn’t be the same without Matthau and Gamble.
Raising Victor Vargas
[ 3 stars out of 4 ]
I liked this movie from the first to the last scene because it was able to provide a naturalistic feel unlike most independent and (especially) mainstream films. The dialogue is deceptively simple but as I was watching I realized that a lot of the people I knew in high school talked like the characters here. The main problem I have with the picture is that it lacked some sort of purpose. Even though I came to realize eventually that the filmmakers were going for an observation on the way the lives of the characters unfold, it didn’t completely work because it leaves most audiences confused regarding what the story is supposed to be about. Thankfully, the actors are charismatic in their own ways so I was able to stick with it without any problem. I thought the romance between Victor Rasuk and Judy Marte was effective because the film didn’t try too hard to make such disparate characters to like each other; the friendship between Marte and Melonie Diaz (I knew she looked extremely familiar and eventually found out that she was in “Be Kind Rewind”) was interesting because even though they do have their beliefs, they don’t always stick with them; Altagracia Guzman, as the grandmother, was really amusing and wise but the audiences eventually come to realize that she, too, is flawed like her grandchildren. This is an urban drama but a picture that is not melodramatic so it feels fresh. If one is into films that flourishes in natural lighting, acting, and script, this one is highly recommended.
Roger & Me
[ 4 stars out of 4 ]
Watching this documentary is like reading an extremely well-written essay. It starts off with a general but brief history of Flint, Michigan but it quickly got to the point: the effects of the layoffs of more than 30,000 people due to Roger Smith’s (and those of power) decision to shut down a General Motors (GM) factory there. One of the reasons why I love Michael Moore’s films is that they are able to give audiences various emotions despite Moore’s questionable techniques. This one is definitey one of the angriest and saddest documentaries I’ve seen but it also has its moments of genuine (if not bittersweet) laughs. Moore is able to present a problem in a clear-cut way, provide several reasons on why a particular issue is a problem, and what the citizens of Flint have done to resolve it (inviting celebrities, building hotels, shopping centers…). The director does this in several fifteen- to twenty-minute segments and it’s efficient because he’s able to cover a lot of ground. I liked the way Moore established the downward spiral of laying off people and the increasing of crime rates, all the while juggling the scenes between the sheriff and the citizens of Flint being evicted from their homes. I also found Moore’s use of contrast impressive: one minute the audience is looking at luxury/brightness, the next minute they’re looking at poverty/bleakness. It’s a basic technique but it’s very effective, especially if one wants to get the point across. It’s gotten so bad in Flint to the point where people are willing to breed rabbits, sell them as pets or as food. (There’s one horrifying scene when Moore actually continues to record a woman killing, beheading, skinning, and gutting a rabbit! As shocked as I was, I couldn’t find myself to look away.) Ultimately, this is a very revealing documentary that critiques corporations, not just GM. But at the same time I think Moore wants to teach us to question his own techniques and arguments in order to become better analytical thinkers.
Just a Question of Love, August, Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
Just a Question of Love
[ 3 stars out of 4 ]
This is another good European gay film that exceeded my expectations because of a script that’s alive. Cyrille Thouvenin is very convincing as a twentysomething that refuses to come out to his parents because of two things: he’s afraid that his parents will not accept him and in turn he cannot accept himself. Thouvenin has great chemistry with Stéphan Guérin-Tillié as the argricultural researcher. I just wish that the filmmakers would’ve gotten rid of the slow parts in the second half of the film. It should have focused more on a character’s decision that lets everything out in the open. I wanted to know more about Thouvenin’s parents, why they despise the idea of homosexuality so much. The parents being old-fashioned is simply not enough of a good reason. I also wanted to see Thouvenin and Guérin-Tillié’s straight male friends. Surely they have at least one. Shortcomings like that made some of the characters a bit one-dimensional. I like that the ending doesn’t neatly tie everything up; that we’re leaving the characters when their lives are just beginning. Most LGBT American films don’t even come close to this film’s performance and script so I’m very glad to have seen this picture.
August (2008)
[ 2 stars out of 4 ]
I liked this film because it is an indie movie but it doesn’t feel like an indie movie. I thought the performances by Naomie Harris (for about ten minutes, I knew she looked familiar and then it occured to me that she was in “28 Days Later”), Adam Scott (in a surprisingly serious character), and particularly Josh Hartnett were strong so it didn’t become completely tedious. But what keeps this movie from becoming great is its extremely slow pacing and very low-key way of storytelling. There were moments in the film where I wondered where it was going or if it was even planning on going anywhere. It started off as a business drama, but it eventually focused on Hartnett’s relationship with his family and ex-girlfriend. I wish it could’ve focused more on the former because there are already a lot of better movies out there that focus on the dynamics of the family. I think if the writers had cut off the scenes that had nothing to do with the business, this picture would have been more thrilling and not too bogged down by sappiness. If it weren’t for the performances, I would’ve been completely frustrated with this film. Hartnett has proven himself again as a serious actor instead of just being a pretty face. Hopefully, more people will realize his potential with a better vehicle the next time around. I’m not saying that one should avoid this film but if one likes slow movies that sticks close to real life, then go ahead and see it.
Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
[ 3 stars out of 4 ]
I really loved this film the first time I saw it but that was back in 2003. I had not seen that many films then so I regarded it quite highly. Five years later, I saw this picture again but I didn’t like it as much. The script was stale compared to “The Terminator” and “Terminator 2: Judgment Day,” but the acting somewhat made up for it. Some other elements that didn’t work for me was Claire Danes’ character. She was annoying because all she did was scream when she was in danger, yell when she didn’t get her own way, and waited to be rescued. I also didn’t like the fact that the writers killed of John Connor’s mother. She was a central figure in the first two films and disposing her was a fatal mistake (even if they couldn’t get Linda Hamilton to reprise her role). Still, this installment is a pretty good one despite its flaws. The visual and special effects were first rate so it’s impossible not to pay attention during the intense action sequences. Arnold Schwarzenneger’s return was more than welcome and choosing Nick Stahl to play John Connor was a wise choise because Stahl can be both weak and strong at the same time (I blame the puppy dog eyes). I also loved the ending because it was quite touching for a science fiction film. I heard from Entertainment Weekly that “Terminator Salvation” would not consider this film’s storyline. I’m not quite sure if that’s a good move (or how it’s going to work out) because this installment is a pretty good transition to the future war against the machines. This was a solid 2003 summer blockbuster film and it’s recommended to any fan of the “Terminator” franchise.
American Psycho, Annie Hall, August Rush
American Psycho
[ 4 stars out of 4 ]
I call this movie a “beautiful mess.” Even though there are many great things about this movie, I feel like it’s seriously lacking something. But I think that’s what the movie is trying to tell its audience: something may look stunning on the outside but inside there might lie a big black hole. I’ve seen most of Christian Bale’s films and this is one of his finest performances. Although he may seem extremely charming on the outside, the way he harbors his cravings for a kill in order to calm his inadequacies was brilliant. His inner freak-outs are memorable and darkly amusing. The tone of the film looks sleek and modern but the shadows during the night might suggest something darker and primeval is at hand. The pacing is excellent and each scene builds on top of one another. By the time the ending comes, the pay off is great but not completely satisfying (in a good way because it supports the film’s purpose). This film is rich of quotes worth pondering over well after the credits stopped rolling. I think a really strong script kept this movie from falling apart so I am ultimately recommending it.
Annie Hall
[ 4 stars out of 4 ]
I love this movie because of its razor-like wit and it provided an interesting character study. Despite the idiosyncrasies of the characters, which could be annoying at times, the audiences come to love them because they are relatable. Not only that, after each scene, we learn why some characters are the way they are, what motivates their actions, and what’s really going on inside their heads despite the things they say. Complex characters and their relationships with each other make a really deep and detailed picture that is worth multiple viewings. Woody Allen and Diane Keaton were born for their roles. If some other people played their characters, I think this film could have ended up a lot differently (most likely in a negative way). I also admired Allen’s use of fusion of techniques, such as vignettes, animation, and flashbacks. His confidence and risks he took for this film paid off in a big way. It made me wish that Woody Allen can still make timeless films such as this one. “Match Point” came really close to that level of precision so I know he still has it in him.
August Rush
[ 4 stars out of 4 ]
To sum it all up: I felt the magic. I expected to like this film but I never expected that I would end up loving it. I thought the first hour or so was pretty good but everything got so much more interesting when the three main characters started go get closer to one another. There were definitely moments when I wanted to yell, “He’s your father! He’s your son!” at the screen because I wanted the family to finally get together because they’ve been longing for each other for a decade! Of course, we all know how it’s going to end: the seemingly disparate characters will end up together. If they did not, that would be a complete rip-off. Still, the old-fashioned formula worked well. I also like the fact that the music is integral to this film. In fact, it almost becomes a character to the point where I was wishing for a majestic score after each important scene. I have heard complaints about the last two to three shots of the film. I thought it was perfectly rendered because we know what was to happen next. I must give kudos to the actors. Robin Williams was a villanous S-O-B but I’m glad he was there to increase the ante. Jonathan Rhys Meyers was somewhat one-dimensional but I forgave him for it because I liked his accent. Keri Russell is heartbreaking and I truly felt her longing while searching for her long lost son. Freddie Highmore continues his great work as a teary-eyed, deeply optimistic kid. I sense that he’s growing comfortable in such roles so I kind of want to see him play some sort of villain next time. Overall, it was a joy watching to his movie because I felt like everything was in perfect harmony (not to mention inspiring!). I might have to buy the soundtrack because it was so majestic.
The American Nightmare, Creepshow, Son of Rambow
American Nightmare, The
[ 2 stars out of 4 ]
I expected this documentary to focus more on the classic horror films from the 1960′s and 1970′s than the social or historical events that inspired them. Even though it’s not what I expected, I liked some parts of this picture because it was able to offer some personal insights from some of the masters of horror (John Carpenter, Wes Craven, David Cronenberg, George Romero, Tobe Hooper). Academics were also interviewed and they were able to elucidate the finer details in films like “Night of the Living Dead” (1968), “Dawn of the Dead” (1978), “The Last House on the Left” (1972), “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” (1974), “Shivers” (1975), and “Halloween” (1978). Even though I am already aware of most of the implications in horror films that the interviewees talked about, I didn’t know how much the Vietnam War impacted the genre. I also didn’t know that the make-up artist Tom Savini learned how to model dead people on screen by watching actual dead victims of war. What didn’t work for me was the way the documentary quickly glossed over the films that should be the focus. This documentary is barely seventy minutes long but it must have talked about the actual films for twenty minutes. Plus, it felt longer than an hour and ten minutes because the social aspects that the interviewees talked about felt repetitive. If this picture didn’t talk so much about the social influences and actually talked about the movies themselves, it would’ve been better and more interesting. I say watch “Going to Pieces: The Rise and Fall of the Slasher Film” for a better horror film analyses.
Creepshow
[ 2 stars out of 4 ]
I expected solid horror before coming into this picture because the five short stories were written by Stephen King. Unfortunately, only two out of the five worked (“The Lonesome Death of Jordy Verrill” and “Something to Tide You Over”), and I almost liked “They’re Creeping Up on You” because the cockroaches made my spine tingle but the execution was poor. The remaining two, “Father’s Day” and “The Crate” dragged on forever and weren’t scary at all (but I did like Hal Holbrook’s performance in the latter story). I guess the stories are more experimentation with the macabre than outright horror. That’s why about 80% of the stories are more comedic than anything. I was actually impressed with Stephen King for playing a redneck farmer in “The Lonesome Death of Jordy Verrill.” He was funny and goofy, but we can’t help feeling sorry for his character once he meets his fate. Even though he was the only actor in that story, he managed to pull it off in an interesting way. This is definitely a B-movie but a rather weak one. I’ve seen better B-movies that are cheesy yet able to deliver truly horrifying images that lasts after the movie has ended (“An American Werewolf in London”). Still, there’s creativity here so I’m giving this a mild recommendation if one is craving a horror film that’s creepy but not too scary. If one is a fan of “Tales from the Crypt” (as I was when I was about seven), this is a good pick to watch on a rainy Friday night.
Son of Rambow
[ 3 stars out of 4 ]
It seems I automatically movies that has something to do with the characters’ love for the cinema. This is not as intense as “The Dreamers” nor is it as adult-inclusive as “Be Kind Rewind” but it has its own witty charm. I was really impressed with the two leads, Bill Milner and Will Poulter, because they were able to deliver a whole spectrum of emotions not common in a lot of child actors today. I completely believed Milner as a lonely boy who barely has any friends partly because of his religious background and Poulter as the bully who happens to have a family that doesn’t care for each other. The first half is a bit goofy but nonetheless funny, but the second half surprised me because it’s much more dramatic and there’s a lot at stake. I’m glad that this is the kind of movie that switches genre somewhere near the middle because the first part got a bit too cute for my liking. By pulling the rug under my feet, I was able to keep my interest. This movie has a lot of layer to it partly because of the undertones. I was interested in the Plymouth Brethren (a religion I’ve never heard of until this picture which somewhat reminds me of the Amish because the members are not alloved to watch television, movies, have cellphones, listen to music and the like), Poulter’s one-sider relationship with his brother (played by Ed Westwick also known as the infamous Chuck Bass of “Gossip Girl”), dealing with a death of a loved one, the meaning of friendship, and of course the love for the cinema. All of these elements were handled so deftly; all of them worked together instead of slowing the story down. The way the disparate storylines were sewn in and out of each other felt organic because the director and writer, Garth Jennings, was able to pace the script. This would have been a four-star film if the first part isn’t as sweet as cotton candy, but otherwise it’s a solid and respectable film.
Shut Up & Sing, The House Bunny, The Last Winter
Shut Up & Sing
[ 4 stars out of 4 ]
Prior to watching this documentary, I liked the Dixie Chicks (Natalie Maines, Emily Robinson, and Martie Maguire) because their songs are catchy and fun. My parents own their CDs and I came across their album “Fly” one day and became a fan right then. I’m not much of a fan of country music but I am a fan of the Dixie Chicks. But after viewing this movie, I respect them even more because of the way they stuck together as not only a band but also as close friends after Maines said that she’s ashamed of President Bush. It was scary watching how the media like the FOX News, conservative politicians, and country stations (and fans!) made her statement into a much bigger deal than it should have been. Personally, I don’t think Maines did anything wrong because it’s her opinion and she has the right to express her political ideals. That’s one thing, but when people actually started saying that the band doesn’t support the troops in Iraq and things like that, you just know that it’s turned into something ugly. I must say that I was surprised to find out that somewhere in the middle of this revealing documentary, it transcended the whole controversy and started to pick apart the inner workings of the band. Some of the songs that were featured during such scenes were touching, sensitive, smart, and full of passion. By the end of this film, I felt like the Dixie Chicks was a phoenix rising from the ashes. There was something really sad about them actually starting from the beginning, garnering new fans, and straying away from country bit by bit; at the same time it’s uplifting because they are still loved, especially in Europe, and they deserve to be. One of this film’s many brilliant messages is that if you don’t give up and if you work hard enough, the things that you have lost can be regained. I’m so glad that the Dixie Chicks stood by with what they believe in… and not losing their humor along the way (especially Maines). I highly recommend this documentary because it’s definitely not just for fans.
House Bunny, The
[ 3 stars out of 4 ]
I was pleasantly surprised with this film. I came into this movie knowing that I’ll like Anna Faris, but I wasn’t convinced that I’ll like the movie because the premise seems a bit early teenager. I imagined it to be as fluffy as cotton candy; that I won’t take anything from it. I was glad to be proven wrong because there were some moments of genuinely touching moments here. Some include the “heart in the head” and “meteor” scenes. Faris and Colin Hanks had some pretty effective (though a bit unusual) chemistry together. They couldn’t be any more opposite but they pulled it off quite well to the point where it was borderline romantic. Meanwhile, Emma Stone, Kat Dennings, and Dana Goodman were able to match Faris’ quirks and antics. In fact, each of the supporting characters had something to do even though half of them were still somewhat one-dimensional at the end of the picture. My biggest concern with this movie is that it lost its momentum during its half-way point. Don’t get me wrong–the second part still had its funny moments but it there wasn’t enough laugh-out-loud jokes compared to the first half. I think this would’ve been a superior picture if it had been cut down a bit and had sharper writing in the second half. I say see it because the actors are so earnest in their roles, you’ll forget you’re watching a film you probably have seen before.
Last Winter, The
[ 2 stars out of 4 ]
I’ve heard many scintillating reviews about this picture, mostly from professional critics, but I was less than impressed. Since the entire movie was set in the Arctic, it’s impossible to not compare it to John Carpenter’s horrifying “The Thing” and a brilliant season one episode of “The X-Files” called “Ice.” Those two are probably five or six times better than “The Last Winter” directed by Larry Fessenden. I’m not saying that I didn’t see any talent or moments of brilliance in this picture. It’s just that those truly chilling scenes were immediately followed by blase dialogue and trite scenes that have nothing to do with the bigger picture. I say get rid of the romance angle between two (or three!) characters and focus more on the idea of wendigo, hallucinations, and isolation in the Arctic; the love triangle greatly slowed down the first half to the point where I rolled my eyes out of frustration. But the second half had its scary moments. I saw this film about one o’clock in the morning and I actually had to turn on the lights because I was afraid I wouldn’t be able to sleep after the movie ended. I would’ve definitely given this film at least three stars if the entire picture was focused on peeling off the mystery and delivered thrills one scene right after another. There were two scenes which I thought stood out: the videotape and the helicopter landing scenes (and their repercussions). I was at the edge of my seat during those scenes and actually caught myself saying, “Oh, my god… That’s so crazy!” A lot of people have been saying that this film had a lot of implications regarding how people neglect our environment. I hardly noticed any of it and was more interested in character development (which didn’t happen). “The Last Winter” reminded me of “The Ruins”–so much potential to be great but had poor execution.
Alligator, Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day, Freshman Orientation
Alligator
[ 1 star out of 4 ]
I like B-movies because they are able to provide a certain level of entertainment (mostly the good kind of camp) that mainstream, studio-backed movies cannot. Unfortunately, this picture is not of those B-movies I like. It’s not a complete failure because some scenes made me laugh like when the alligator attacked the policeman and the wedding chaos. However, there is no solid story, the pace is as slow as molasses, and the acting is pretty bad. Robert Forster and Robin Riker had some sort of chemistry during their more romantic scenes, but when they actually face the alligator, it seems as though they were on a completely different page. I understand that this has a low budget so I tried not to look down too much on its visual effects such as when the alligator would look a bit cartoonish, but that issue became a bit too distracting as the movie went on. I liked the scenes where Forster would ask Riker or some other scientist about their opinion on why the alligator became gigantic because they were able to come up with not-so-outlandish explanations. That said, I still can’t forgive the fact that the kills were uninspired; the filmmakers tried to summon the tension that was present in excellent horror creature films like “Jaws” but they just couldn’t pull it off. This might be a must-see for B-movie buffs, but I wouldn’t watch this movie again any time soon even if I had nothing to do on a Friday night and it happens to be playing on the Sci-Fi channel.
Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day
[ 3 stars out of 4 ]
This is another one of those films that solidifies my love for Frances McDormand. She’s a chameleon in every role she plays and she often adds an extra spice that makes her character that much more lovable. But she’s not the only one that shines here. Amy Adams more than held her own, especially during that bar scene when she sings and realizes what she really wants in life. Equally good are fascinating Shirley Henderson (who somewhat reminded me of Megan Mullally not just because of her voice but the way she carried herself) and the romantic Lee Pace. At first I didn’t know whether I was going to like the entire picture because the first twenty minutes were all over the place. There was a lot of energy going on but I was doubtful whether the filmmakers could harness all of it and keep a certain focus at the same time. Eventually, I was proven wrong and the movie found its footing. It got better as it went along and I found myself caring more and more about the characters because some of them really do deserve to be happy. There was a lot of drama in the high society that McDormand jumped into (which was kind of like watching “Gossip Girl” but for adults and more toned down), but she was able to keep her old-fashioned, witty self. This would’ve been a better film if it was consistent from beginning to end, but I am more than happy with it. Scenes such as when the parties were interrupted by impending war was nothing short of engaging. The ending was touching but not too sappy; it is also very smart because it can lead to an interesting discussion about women’s role in society.
Freshman Orientation
[ 3 stars out of 4 ]
This is not a great movie by any means, but I was really amused by it. Just when I thought it was about to take the direction of the horrendous “Camp,” it pulls the rug from under me and actually shows some insight and sensitivity. A lot of people think that this film is really insensitive. Yes, at some parts it is… but I think one of the filmmakers’ aim is to make fun of certain offenses. One obvious way to achieve that is to actually show such offenses. Some actors that stood out for me were Sam Huntington as the guy who pretends to be gay in order to get a girl to like him, Mike Erwin who’s in a quest to find his identity, Heather Matarazzo as the one of the pledges of the sorority, and John Goodman as the bartender on one of the gay bars. All of them made me laugh out loud in some way, whether it’s regarding their circumstances or how they deliver a particular line. Having said all that, this movie had some pretty big flaws. For one, this movie is only about an hour and thirty-five minutes long, but it feels longer than that. The setting doesn’t look like a real college campus at all, while some of the drama are a bit contrived and high school. Plus, I wish they could’ve explored the relationship between Huntington and Erwin. I completely believed that they were good friends so I wish the filmmakers would’ve spent more time with them than showing us “college” parties that doesn’t have anything to do with the bigger picture. Still, I’m giving this one a thumbs up because the allusions made me laugh and the actors are so earnest in their roles. Yes, it could’ve been a deeper movie but it’s pretty above average just the way it is.
A.I.: Artificial Intelligence, About a Boy, Alpha Dog
A.I.: Artificial Intelligence
[ 4 stars out of 4 ]
I remember watching this film when I was about thirteen years old and I instantly fell in love with it. I own the DVD and whenever I watch it with people, they either love it or hate it, so I almost always prefer to watch it alone. Those that belong in the latter category claim that it’s unreasonably long, depressing from start to finish, and not having a lot of action scenes (this bit really bothers me). I love this movie because it is a total stylistic hybrid of two of my favourite directors, Steven Spielberg (who provides light and hope) and Stanley Kubrick (who provides edge and darkness). If I were to divide the film into three parts, I would say the first and the third part were Spielberg’s forte. The middle part is Kubrick to the core… but it is not fully realized because he did not get to helm it. Hence, I think that’s the weakness of this minor masterpiece. Still, there are a lot to recommend: the visual effects, the moral conundrum regarding the relationship between humans and machines, and the overall message when it comes to the capacity to chase after one’s dreams. I actually prefer my science fiction films as insightful (“2001: A Space Odyssey”) instead of adrenaline-fueled (“The Core”) but a bit of both is refreshing (“Children of Men”). I believe that this is Haley Joel Osment’s best performance because of the way he changed from having a robotic personality to having a completely human-like drive and heart. There are many undertones that can be found in this film with repeated viewings as well. I think this is one of Spielberg’s best work because he is able to craft a story with a great balance of imagination, intelligence, and heart.
About a Boy
[ 4 stars out of 4 ]
Every time I watch this movie, it makes me want to give Hugh Grant a big hug because his character needs some serious lovin’! I love that this film is a bit off-beat but not to the point where it feels too indie or trying too hard. Therefore, Grant was able to play his usual self but with a bit of an edge (which was surprisingly interesting). The fact that Grant does not play a prince charming, like in most of his films, is a big plus because he reminded me that can act outside of his comfort zone. The cinematography is crisp and the setting actually feels like they’re in England. There were several inside jokes, one of them was “The Sixth Sense” bit about the main kid, played by Nicholas Hoult, being able to take care of his mom if he were Haley Joel Osment. Small scenes like that made the whole picture more enjoyable because it shows that even though some of the material here are serious, it’s not afraid to be silly. It’s a great flick to see if it’s raining outside and you don’t feel like going out.
Alpha Dog
[ 4 stars out of 4 ]
Emile Hirsch is pimp in this movie! As embarrassed I am to say that, I believed him to be the leader of the pack. Even though he was short, he overpowers everyone because his character has the money and his limits extended more than anyone (arguably). Critics loved Justin Timberlake in this movie and I must agree with them. He gave heart to this movie and in the end he ends up to be the one audiences got to know most. But I must say I also loved Anton Yelchin’s performance. His character’s innocence was demolished during the last thirty minutes of the film and the way he did it took my breath away because he was so convincing. Even though the dialogue is kind of “ghetto,” I advise you to not let that hinder your decision to watch this amazing sleeper film. I can’t recommend this film enough.
Smart People, Defying Gravity, Stand by Me
Smart People
[ 3 stars out of 4 ]
Even though I’ve seen this kind of movie before, I still really liked it because it had a good balance between comedy and drama. Not only is it about family dynamics, it’s also about relationships outside the home (or lack thereof). In the middle of the film, I realized the greatness of its title. Yes, most of the characters are smart academic-wise but some of them lack emotional intelligence, which makes it harder for them to be liked by others. Dennis Quaid is great as a professor and a father who not only wants to get his book published but also become the head of the English department. Quaid is often very elegant and I think he truly shines. A lot of people claim that Ellen Page plays the same role as a blend between quirky and too smart for her own good. I disagree because her character here is not as likable as Juno; the nuances in Page’s acting can be discovered if one decides to look deeper into the character she’s playing. I also really liked Sarah Jessica Parker, Thomas Haden Church, and especially Ashton Holmes. I first took notice of him in “Wind Chill” (but seen “A History of Violence” first) and I’m glad to have stumbled upon him again. His character brings heart and something different to the story. Overall, this movie may not be the most original but I thought it was smart, funny, and heartbreaking; for a movie that’s only about an hour and thirty minutes long, in the last few scenes, I feel like the characters have grown a lot. This is worth a rental if one likes character studies.
Defying Gravity (1997)
[ 2 stars out of 4 ]
Overall, I’m glad to have stumbled over this small gay-themed movie even though it had its flaws. I enjoyed the characters, especially the romance between Daniel Chilson and Don Handfield. Even though I wish there were more scenes of them together because those were when the movie became alive (they have great chemistry!), in a way their limited time on screen together made their interactions that much more special. I also liked Chilson’s relationship with his best friend, played by Niklaus Lange. I had major doubts about Lange’s character because at first the filmmakers weren’t using him the best possible way. I was suspicious (and slightly annoyed) because they didn’t know what to do with him. Luckily enough, they found the right angle regarding Lange’s character so I was very happy about that. One of the highlights of the film involves Chilson and Lange’s conversation in the mountains. A character that I wanted to get to know more was the girl played by Linna Carter. Instead, she just appeared in and out of the story without really having much of a purpose. On the more negative side, I thought that the writing was borderline terrible. Yes, it was made in the 90′s and it’s a small film but those are not excuses. I’ve seen plenty of films that are older than twenty years and films that didn’t have a big budget that have a really good script. I actually laughed out loud during some of the scenes because some characters would say things like “very… uncool!” when someone messes up. In a way, I felt like I was watching a TV-movie during some scenes. I give this film kudos for actually wanting to focus on the story, unlike most LGBT movies that focus too much on the sex scenes. This one barely had any but it was interesting to watch because we ultimately care for the characters.
Stand by Me
[ 4 stars out of 4 ]
This is without a doubt one of the best coming-of-age tales I’ve ever seen. I haven’t read the novella by Stephen King which this film was based on so I don’t know how close this movie followed the original material. However, I cannot praise this film any higher. The four main cast is top notch: Wil Wheaton, River Phoenix, Corey Feldman, and Jerry O’Connell. Each of them were put on the spotlight during their journey to see a dead body, so we really got to know them well, despite the film’s running time of only about an hour and thirty-five minutes. Wheaton is the writer whose brother had died, played by John Cusack, and doesn’t feel accepted by his father, Phoenix is the natural leader of the group who is both tough and sympathetic, Feldman is the sarcastic kid and is a bit emotionally disturbed, and O’Connell is the “fat kid” who desperately wants to belong with the group by trying to prove himself. I found this film to be really insightful about not only childhood friendships but all kinds of friendships in general. The scenes where Wheaton and Phoenix would bond by sharing their thoughts and emotions really put tears in my eyes because their acting was top-notch; I felt like I was watching regular people shedding their souls in order to achieve some sort of an understanding. For a pretty short picture, there were so many highlights which include the bridge, the leech, Wheaton’s revenge story around the campire, and of course the scenes where Wheaton and Phoenix were one-on-one, just talking about their failures, successes, and goals. Another actor that is worth mentioning is Kiefer Sutherland as the bully. He’s was intimidating… but in a good way. I was convinced that he could actually hurt the four kids. I have to say that he somewhat kind of reminded me of Emile Hirsch in “Alpha Dog” (the tough guy persona) and “The Air I Breathe” (looks-wise). This was really a joy to watch because each scene has something special and memorable in it. That certain glow that the picture had made it look timeless, and the script combined with Rob Reiner’s excellent direction made this more than just a movie for me.
Stranger Than Fiction, Mozart and the Whale, Bedrooms and Hallways
Stranger than Fiction (2006)
[ 3 stars out of 4 ]
Strangely enough, I found Will Farrell more fascinating here than in his other films where he usually plays a dumb goofball. His character is mature but has his moments of absolute silliness, sentimental and sensitive, and best of all, we care about what would happen to him. Farrell’s performance is equalled by the supporting cast: Emma Thompson, Maggie Gyllenhaal and Queen Latifah. All of them are intelligent characters that capture the essence of regular people in real life. I think this is the kind of movie that one would do better without questioning every logic. Yes, it’s imaginative and quirky (and some events that drive the story are impossible) but that’s part of the fun. It’s a surreal comedy and we just have to accept it for what it is. I found this film to be very literate and involving; not to mention pretty much everything that’s going on in this film, from Thompson’s writer’s block to the romance between Gyllenhaal and Farrell, works. Lastly, I thought it was a smart move when the filmmakers decided to let Farrell and Thompson meet a little bit more than the half-way mark. I thought that their big reunion would happen in the end, so I was surprised. That way, we get to really understand the many complex issues between the writer and her subject. I think this is a really good film that is comparable to “Being John Malkovich” (though less grand in scope) in many respects.
Mozart and the Whale
[ 2 stars out of 4 ]
While I was watching the film, I caught myself smiling from time to time because the story and its characters are very cute and nice. And that’s the movie’s problem: it’s just nice. I feel like the filmmakers could’ve aimed at something higher than a cute romance between Josh Hartnett and Radha Mitchell, two really talented and underrated actors. I don’t know much about Asperger’s syndrome so I don’t know how accurately the film portrayed those people who have that disability. However, upon reading other reviews who do have relatives that have the disability, they claim that the portrayal is inaccurate. It’s unfortunate because I wanted to know more about people who have Asperger’s, especially after watching Heather on “America’s Next Top Model” Cycle 9. The direction could have used some work because the film started off really good. But as the ending approached, the movie kind of fizzled out. I would’ve given this picture a three stars if it would’ve at least maintained its momentum. The chemistry between Hartnett and Mitchell worked and they looked good together. It’s a shame most people don’t realize that Hartnett is more than just a heartthrob; he can be a serious actor if he so chooses. As much as I liked this movie, I can’t quite enthusiastically recommend it because it could’ve been so much more.
Bedrooms and Hallways
[ 2 stars out of 4 ]
I usually like gay and lesbian films from Europe because most of them are more honest and are able to delve more into the lives of their characters than American films. However, this is one of those unfortunate exceptions. Overall, I liked the movie: the acting was okay, the cast is pretty good, and the story was tolerable. However, I didn’t like the movie’s ultimate message because it’s very inaccurate when it comes to portraying homosexuality. With that egregious ending, I was completely turned off by the film and I almost gave this a one star out of four prior to writing my review. But I did like it up until the ending so I decided to give it a break. It’s a really disappointing picture because, with a little tweak in the story here and there, this could’ve turned out to be an insightful commentary about gays that are entering or in their thirties. That issue of wanting to find the one and ultimately settling down is not fully explored, but only glossed over. The chemistry between Kevin McKidd and James Purefoy was cute but nothing groundbreaking. I also thought the bit about the friend (played by Tom Hollander) and the real state agent was distracting even though it provided the much needed humor. Overall, this movie had serious problems and needed a complete rewriting (especially the end) if it were to end up a good movie.
Persepolis, The Counterfeiters, Baghead
Persepolis
[ 3 stars out of 4 ]
This may be an animated film on the outside but don’t let that fool you. This is a heavily political, self-aware, coming of age film that focuses on an inquisitive Iranian girl that turned into a strong Iranian woman. I have to admit that I didn’t understand the politics because I don’t know much about the history of Iran. So, it took me a while to get used to the background of the story. Things really started to pick up when the focus turns to the character; how she had to lose people she loved because of the Islamic Revolution, her immigration to western Europe, her experience with boys, and her eventual return to her home country. I thought this was a very insightful film but the drama wasn’t heavy-handed. In fact, there were a lot of humorous scenes from time to time in order to make the story a little lighter. I could relate with the main character’s rebellion even though I didn’t go through the same things she did, whether it’s hanging out with people who are outsiders themselves or immersing herself with hard rock music. Her most sensitive episodes when she came to be embarrassed of who she is and where she came from is not far from what I had experienced when I had to assimilate when I was new in America. This really is an impressive not-so-ordinary animated film because it aims to bring down barriers: that animated movies are mainly for children. I must also give kudos to Vincent Paronnaud and Marjane Satrapi for writing and directing this good-hearted picture. I also admired the voice-over of the main character by Chiara Mastroianni. I enthusiastically recommend this movie because it’s something different and it really does have a great message about our relationship with our cultural identities.
Counterfeiters, The (2007)
[ 3 stars out of 4 ]
I thought I’ve already seen all the kinds of stories about the concentration camps in World War II so this movie really surprised me. This is the first time I’ve seen a movie that took the angle of the counterfeiters’ experience in the camps (I wasn’t even aware that the Nazis had the operation until I heard about this film). Not only is it interesting, the style of it made me feel like I was right there with the characters. Although slow in some parts, those are more than forgiven because the film is undeniably well-written and well-directed. I got this feeling that desperation is always in the air even though the characters are being treated “well” (as opposed to the ones not in the counterfeiting operation). All of the actors did a convincing job playing their roles, notably Karl Markovics and Devid Striesow. They embodied their roles with such intensity that it was fascinating to see them interact. I also enjoyed how each character can be placed different points on the moral spectrum; their choices in action and words make them complex characters worth spending time with. This is generally a very good film but it’s even better if one is hoping for a different vantage point regarding the victims in the concentration camps.
Baghead
[ 3 stars out of 4 ]
I adore films that are able to prove that you can make a movie for basically next to nothing, but if it has a clever script then most of the other crucial components will come into place. I must mention Jay Duplass and Mark Duplass for writing and directing a movie that made me laugh and feel fear most often wrapped in one scene (some of the humor are borderline darkly comic). Even though it took its merry time to establish the characters and their motivations, hand-held camera and all, it was an interesting watch from start to finish. We find out something about each character after each minute, whether they may be talking about nothing or just sitting in awkward silence. Speaking of awkward, I did adore the awkward humor, which I don’t want to go into specifics because I don’t want to ruin the surprise for those who are interested in watching the film. I also want to commend the four actors: Ross Partridge, Steve Zissis, Greta Gerwig, and Elise Muller. Even though their acting might be a bit amateurish, I liked their zeal. Somehow, their style worked because I feel like they are people I can meet anywhere; they seem very amicable. But I must say that they’re really good at freaking out and being cute with each other, basically the extremes. As for the horror aspect of this picture, I have to admit that I did get scared at times, especially during the night scenes, specifically in the last thirty minutes. This is a pretty effective horror-comedy that almost feels like a documentary because of the hand-held camera. Don’t let the low budget scare you because the filmmakers really do have something interesting to offer.
The Bourne Ultimatum, 28 Days Later, 28 Weeks Later
Bourne Ultimatum, The
[ 4 stars out of 4 ]
Jason Bourne pulled a Sydney Bristow. For the fans of the great show called “Alias,” you’ll know what I’m talking about. If not, that’s okay. All the more reason for you to see it. Although I predicted that something like that happened to Bourne, it remains extraordinarily exciting. No one is safe in this supposed final installment. I am immensely glad they had the bravado to kill off a potential main character in the first few scenes, not to mention put Julia Stiles’ beloved character in an unimaginable danger in the roofs. It was so exhilirating, I got numb and shaken at several points throughout the film. The assassins are deadlier, the hand-to-hand combats more real, and the car chases at its best. Not to mention desperation is in the air as characters switch from one side to another in search for the truth. I can only hope they make a fourth movie in the future–I can’t get enough of Jason Bourne! For me, “The Bourne” series has revolutionized the spy-thriller genre in so many levels. Which one is the best “Bourne” movie? All of them. They’re unique in their own way. This one expertly used flashbacks, past dialogues, scenes, character foils, and similar situations that happened in the past two movies. It was eerie yet it provides some form of closure. It reminded me of the last season of “Buffy the Vampire Slayer.” It is officially my favourite film series of all time, right next to “Indiana Jones.” “The Bourne Ultimatum” is THE best movie of summer 2007.
28 Days Later
[ 4 stars out of 4 ]
The first time I saw this film, I was in total awe because of how well-written and well-executed it was. Cillian Murphy was great as a man who wakes up in a London hospital, completely unaware that the city has been evacuated… and the ones left are the hungry undead. I must admit that I love placing myself in his shoes, knowing that all of it is fictional. But when I actually had a dream that is extremely similar to this film, I was absolutely horrified and woke up soaked in sweat, my heart pounding a thousand beats per minute. The tone of the film is nothing like I’ve ever seen in a horror movie, which was really refreshing. The use of silence is masterful and the scares are first class. Although the movie takes a bit of a dive in its third act, it’s more than forgivable because the rest of the film was eerily consistent. This was also interesting because this is not a zombie film that takes a look at the global crisis. It focuses on one group of people, which means it is more personal and we get to learn more about the characters as the movie goes along… That is, until or if they get infected by the Rage Virus. This is a modern classic zombie film, which I have no doubt will be a horror favourite twenty or fifty years from now.
28 Weeks Later
[ 4 stars out of 4 ]
A sequel that is as good, at times better, than its predecessor. What made this movie better than the original is that there were more scenes where the characters were being attacked. With that comes a sense of danger lurking around the corner wherever they go, so the audiences anticipate what’s coming and it becomes engaging. This movie also had some sort of progress: the focus is now on the family rather than the individual like in the first movie. It also embraced a possibility of how the virus infected others society-wise prior to the first scene in “28 Days Later.” Not only that, they also managed to talk about the idea of a mutation and a cure which, as a Biology student, I appreciated because the scientists’ explanations made some sort of sense. What this film lacked, nonetheless, is that bleak tone the first movie had–that sense of hopelessness, misery, and isolation. It also lacked a sense of sadness that the first movie fully grasped. This is a solid effort and, I must say, I’m looking forward to “28 Months Later.”
