<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wackness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://franzpatrick.com/2009/03/04/the-wackness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://franzpatrick.com/2009/03/04/the-wackness/</link>
	<description>an aspiring medical scientist who loves the movies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 21:47:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franz Patrick</title>
		<link>http://franzpatrick.com/2009/03/04/the-wackness/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Franz Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 06:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franzpatrick.com/?p=1871#comment-366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lucinda: I did like &quot;Midnight Cowboy&quot; but I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll watch it again any time soon. It was pretty slow but I give it credit for being daring at the time of its release.

Jørgen (I hope I did that symbol thing right...): If I did half-stars, I would probably give &quot;The Wackness&quot; that rating. It was so painful to watch, I wanted to bang my head on the screen. &quot;Juno,&quot; to me, felt much more natural because I guess I know some people that kinda talk like the characters in that film. In &quot;The Wackness,&quot; a lot of people talked &quot;ghetto&quot; and it&#039;s too much. I felt like everybody talked liked that except for the adults. Yeah, in reality, you can go to the poorer side of the urban areas but not EVERY SINGLE teen talks like that. 

Also, unlike you, I thought the so-called relationship between Peck and Kingsley was so contrived. Kingsley behaves like a child and they have nothing in common. And if that&#039;s the point of it, I still felt like the filmmakers were urging me that they&#039;re supposed to be learning from each other. Maybe it was hard for me to find their connection because I couldn&#039;t relate to either of them. =\]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucinda: I did like &#8220;Midnight Cowboy&#8221; but I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll watch it again any time soon. It was pretty slow but I give it credit for being daring at the time of its release.</p>
<p>Jørgen (I hope I did that symbol thing right&#8230;): If I did half-stars, I would probably give &#8220;The Wackness&#8221; that rating. It was so painful to watch, I wanted to bang my head on the screen. &#8220;Juno,&#8221; to me, felt much more natural because I guess I know some people that kinda talk like the characters in that film. In &#8220;The Wackness,&#8221; a lot of people talked &#8220;ghetto&#8221; and it&#8217;s too much. I felt like everybody talked liked that except for the adults. Yeah, in reality, you can go to the poorer side of the urban areas but not EVERY SINGLE teen talks like that. </p>
<p>Also, unlike you, I thought the so-called relationship between Peck and Kingsley was so contrived. Kingsley behaves like a child and they have nothing in common. And if that&#8217;s the point of it, I still felt like the filmmakers were urging me that they&#8217;re supposed to be learning from each other. Maybe it was hard for me to find their connection because I couldn&#8217;t relate to either of them. =\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: queerlefty</title>
		<link>http://franzpatrick.com/2009/03/04/the-wackness/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[queerlefty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franzpatrick.com/?p=1871#comment-352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you already know, I liked this movie a lot more than you did(which doesn&#039;t say much, considering you didn&#039;t like it at all, heh.). I saw a (admittedly somewhat naive) 1994 period piece where you saw a film desperately trying to be hip, and even though I never neither use drugs nor endorse drug use of any kind, I kind of liked that this movie didn&#039;t moralize. For the first ten minutes or so, I had the same problems with &#039;The Wackness&#039; that I once had with &#039;Juno&#039; (the street lingo felt sort of forced at first), but when I first grew accustomed to it, it stopped bothering me.

&#039;The Wackness&#039; is not flawless, but to me it actually felt quite fresh, because of the relationship between Josh Peck and Ben Kingsley&#039;s character, and because it dared to be so specific about it&#039;s place in recent pop culture, in an unforced way.

Still, I suspect we&#039;ll never even come close to agree on this one, heh. (It could also be that I loved it more because I had just seen this incredibly boring Macedonian moral drama &#039;I&#039;m from Titov Velez&#039; at my local film festival, and &#039;The Wackness&#039; gave me a light-hearted break).

My review:

http://welcometoallofthat.wordpress.com/2008/10/22/what-josh-peck-adds-to-the-wackness/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you already know, I liked this movie a lot more than you did(which doesn&#8217;t say much, considering you didn&#8217;t like it at all, heh.). I saw a (admittedly somewhat naive) 1994 period piece where you saw a film desperately trying to be hip, and even though I never neither use drugs nor endorse drug use of any kind, I kind of liked that this movie didn&#8217;t moralize. For the first ten minutes or so, I had the same problems with &#8216;The Wackness&#8217; that I once had with &#8216;Juno&#8217; (the street lingo felt sort of forced at first), but when I first grew accustomed to it, it stopped bothering me.</p>
<p>&#8216;The Wackness&#8217; is not flawless, but to me it actually felt quite fresh, because of the relationship between Josh Peck and Ben Kingsley&#8217;s character, and because it dared to be so specific about it&#8217;s place in recent pop culture, in an unforced way.</p>
<p>Still, I suspect we&#8217;ll never even come close to agree on this one, heh. (It could also be that I loved it more because I had just seen this incredibly boring Macedonian moral drama &#8216;I&#8217;m from Titov Velez&#8217; at my local film festival, and &#8216;The Wackness&#8217; gave me a light-hearted break).</p>
<p>My review:</p>
<p><a href="http://welcometoallofthat.wordpress.com/2008/10/22/what-josh-peck-adds-to-the-wackness/" rel="nofollow">http://welcometoallofthat.wordpress.com/2008/10/22/what-josh-peck-adds-to-the-wackness/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucinda Mae Leong</title>
		<link>http://franzpatrick.com/2009/03/04/the-wackness/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucinda Mae Leong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://franzpatrick.com/?p=1871#comment-351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sounds vaguely like &quot;Midnight Cowboy&quot;, a 1969 film, which, as with The Wackness, had Dustin Hoffman in it. 

I noted in your archives that you&#039;d seen &quot;Midnight Cowboy&quot;, and appear to have liked it - perhaps as much as did I?  

But I&#039;ll give &quot;The Wackness&quot; a miss.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds vaguely like &#8220;Midnight Cowboy&#8221;, a 1969 film, which, as with The Wackness, had Dustin Hoffman in it. </p>
<p>I noted in your archives that you&#8217;d seen &#8220;Midnight Cowboy&#8221;, and appear to have liked it &#8211; perhaps as much as did I?  </p>
<p>But I&#8217;ll give &#8220;The Wackness&#8221; a miss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

