Skip to content

May 11, 2009

5

Star Trek

by Franz Patrick


Star Trek (2009)
★★★ / ★★★★

I’ve never seen an episode of the original “Star Trek” series nor have I seen any prior feature films. Having said that, I’ll review this picture as a stand-alone film instead of comparing it to the original television show and the ten movies that came before. I’m so glad that J.J. Abrams took over this franchise. Being familiar with his best work such as “Alias” and “Fringe,” I knew that, as a director, he would expertly balance three elements: humor, intelligence and thrilling action. Just when things would get too serious, a character would say something really funny to release some tension and avoid taking “The Dark Knight” direction (which is dark, brooding and heavy). “Star Trek” completely embraced a somewhat light-hearted tone and it worked because this film’s ultimate goal is to reboot a barely alive franchise. When it comes to winning new fans, I think it’s successful because me and four of my friends had no idea what we were in for but all of us ended up really liking it. Even I have to admit that I’m now interested in watching the films that came before it. Each actor had something significant to contribute. Chris Pine was a really good James T. Kirk because even though he seemed a little hard on the edges, he had a sense of humor and he knew how to take control when the situation was dire. He balanced danger and charisma exceedingly well. Zachary Quinto as Spock was consistently entertaining because he managed to turn a very intellectually and emotionally serious character into someone that I rooted for despite his (very) uptight nature. In the end, I wanted to know more about him because I could feel that the character had the potential to evolve. Although Eric Bana as Nero could’ve been used more, I thought he was manacing enough to be the villain-of-the-week. Aside from them, I also enjoyed watching Zoe Saldana as Uhura, Anton Yelchin as Pavel Chekov, John Cho as Sulu and Simon Pegg as Scotty. But out of all the supporting characters, Yelchin stood out to me the most because of his really thick (and often amusing) Russian accent. (Though I may be a bit biased because I just love him in everything.) I heard that sequels are already planned and I’m excited to see them. Now that the main characters are established, I think the sequel has more than enough chance of being bigger and better by exploring other planets and meeting new life forms. I hope Abrams will stick with this franchise because in each of his projects, he has a certain syle that I cannot help but admire. But best of all, it’s his vision that separates this film from just good to almost great. Older fans of the franchise will most likely nitpick and say something negative. Nonetheless, “Star Trek” is not to be missed. Don’t be fooled by my three-star rating because this is a solid three-and-half-star film. (I just don’t do halves.) I refrained from giving it my best rating because I felt like it somewhat held back from becoming “too epic.”

5 Comments Post a comment
  1. May 11 2009

    They wanted to mainstream the franchise, and judging from your reaction they succeeded.

    Here is my take on the movie (with lots o’ pics) if you are interested:

    http://fortresstakes.wordpress.com/2009/05/10/star-trek-2009/

    Reply
  2. Michael
    May 12 2009

    i keep hearing good review about this movie so i plan on watching it. check out star trek first contact, its one of the more recent films. and star trek is almsot totally dead, there is no series on television anymore… i wonder if becuase of the success of this movie, a new series will come out? oh yea have you watched little nemo yet?

    Reply
  3. May 16 2009

    Also having never seen the original series or any of the previous movies, I went into this film expecting to be bored. I wasn’t. I really enjoyed it and agree with you that Yelchin was a standout. Star Trek – at least this incarnation – has a new fan in me.

    Reply
  4. May 22 2009

    I was very pleasantly surprised by this one, too. It has an inclusive sense of humor that I was an important icebreaker for me, and for the most part it’s also very-well cast. Particularly, I thin Chris Pine made a very good Kirk. I initially though his almost fratboy-like attitude would be irritating, but he brought a much needed lightness to the matter, something I would also admiringly attribute to Yelchin.

    Finally, I just have to say that former ‘Home and Away’ star Chris Hemsworth, who played Kirk’s father in the movie’s first five minutes, has grown into a mighty fine young man. The same is of course true for Pine.

    Reply
  5. May 25 2009

    Chris Hemsworth looked soooo familiar but when I IMDBed him, I couldn’t recognize any of his works (including “Home and Away”). But I could swear I’ve seen him before “Star Trek.” And also, he and Chris Pine really DO look alike. It was eerie. Now if only Javier Bardem and Jeffrey Dean Morgan would star in the same movie. I STILL can’t tell them apart!!

    I’m happy you enjoyed the film! I agree with what you said about Pine’s fratboyish attitude. He managed to remain loyal to the old Cpt. Kirk (I’ve now seen clips from YouTube–lol) while at the same time incorporating some of his own ideas on how young Kirk should be.

    I think it’s THE best summer blockbuster so far… But I think it’s going to have a stiff competition these coming weeks.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Note: HTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to comments