Skip to content

July 19, 2010

9

Inception

by Franz Patrick


Inception (2010)
★★★★ / ★★★★

The film started off like a spy film: the glamorous and exotic locale, fashionable suits, femme fatales. But unlike typical espionage pictures, the first half of the characters’ goal was not to steal a valuable object but an idea located deep inside a target’s dreams. The second (and more difficult) half was to get away with it by allowing the target to wake and continue living his life as if nothing had been taken away from him. This simplified two-step process was known as “extraction,” in which Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) was a leading expert. Cobb was not allowed to return to the United States to see his children so Kaito (Ken Watanabe) made an offer that Cobb simply could not refuse: to plant an idea in a future corporate leader’s mind (Cillian Murphy), known as “inception,” which had rarely been done before. If this last massion was successful, it would lead to Cobb’s freedom. In order to accomplish the mission, Cobb had to assemble a team (Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Ellen Page, Tom Hardy, Dileep Rao) with very special talents and they had to dive in the target’s subconscious while navigating their way through defenses set up by the mind and the secrets Cobb kept from his unsuspecting team.

When the movie started, I barely had any idea what was happening. I knew something exciting was happening on screen because of the intricate action sequences and splendid visuals but as far as the story went, it was still nondescript. However, that was not at all a problem because the film eventually established the elementary elements required so that we could have an understanding of what was about to happen. Despite its two-and-a-half-hour running time, I was impressed with its pacing. There was an assigned time for getting to know the lead character in terms of his career, his past, and his inner demons. Once I had a somewhat clear idea of his motivations, I immediately felt that there was something wrong with the way he saw the world and the specifics were eventually revealed in an elegant, sometimes emotional, and often mind-bending manner. Their missions were often sabotaged by Mal (Marion Cotillard), Cobb’s projection of his wife who had passed away, due to an unsolved guilt that he constantly pushed away. Throughout the course of the film, that guilt, like Mal, became more powerful and became a hindrance that the main character and his team could no longer set aside. Anyone with a background in Psychology will truly appreciate the film’s level of intelligence in terms of Sigmund Freud’s revolutionary idea involving the subconscious manifesting in our every day lives and maintaining our mental homeostasis. But what impressed me even more was the minute details in the script such as the characters mentioning topics such as positive and negative emotions interacting and which side had more power over the other, one’s sense of reality while being in a dream… within a dream, and even questions like “If we die in our dreams, do we die in real life?” were acknowledged. That’s one of the things I loved about the film: it was able to present ideas we are aware of but it just had enough dark twist to create something original.

As with most movies with grand ambitions, I had some questions left unanswered. What about those instances when we are aware that we are dreaming and we can control what will happen in our dreams? I have experienced such a phenomenon time and again (and I’m sure others have as well) and I was curious if and how the movie could explain such a strange occurrence. And what about those moments when we sleep but we are not yet dreaming? What if our dreams are interrupted? Sure, the team injected chemicals in their bodies to stabilize the feeling of reality in dreams but, as the movie perfectly illustrated, nothing completely goes according to plan. Perhaps I’m just being more analytical than I should be thanks to the fascinating sleep studies I encountered in Neurobiology and Psychology courses. But I believe a mark of a great film is open to question, interpretation and debate. I say we question because we have embraced the material and we are hungry for more. That’s how I know I’m emotionally and intellectually invested in a film. That absolute killer final shot and the audiences’ collective sigh of anticipation for the clear-cut answer as the screen cut to black was simply icing on the cake.

“Inception,” written and directed by Christopher Nolan, was certainly worth over a year’s wait since it was still in pre-production. I remember trying look for more information about it during my midterm study breaks (and getting so caught up in it) so I am completely elated that it was finally released and it turned out to be one of the finest and most rewarding movies of 2010. It may not have been its goal but “Inception” certainly adds a much needed positive reputation to mainstream movies, especially in a season full of sequels and spoon-fed entertainment. I was optimistic early 2010 in terms of the quality of movies about to be released in theaters, especially when Martin Scorsese’s “Shutter Island” came out, but now I am more than convinced that the film industry is experiencing a drought of refreshing and daring ideas. Some critics may compare “Inception” to “The Matrix” (both great movies) but I think “Inception” functions on a higher level overall and it has an identity of its own. Perhaps an injection of new blood that is “Inception” will inspire movie studios to take more risks in terms of which movies they green light. There is no doubt that mindless, swashbuckling popcorn adventures or even extremely diluted romantic comedies have their place in the market. But with the critical and mass success of “Inception,” it shows that audiences are always ready to be inspired by new ideas and to dream a little bigger.

About these ads
9 Comments Post a comment
  1. Jul 19 2010

    I still havent seen shutter island! Nice Review

    Reply
    • Jul 19 2010

      Oh, you must! Which reminds me, I need to purchase it on DVD.

      Reply
  2. Jul 19 2010

    Lovely review. For me, it was character-based questions that bugged me (though I’m sure if I gave the ending/dream mythology more thought, it would haunt my psyche for years). Like, what happened to Nash? Who was that kid on the train in the beginning? If you can only use your own totem, why was Cobb using his wife’s? How, exactly, was Michael Caine related to Cobb?

    Stuff like that.

    Reply
    • Jul 19 2010

      Oh yea! I forgot about that kid in the beginning… You’ve got some interesting questions that I haven’t even thought about. And I thought Caine was DiCaprio’s dad? Hmm.

      Reply
  3. Jul 19 2010

    Freakin amazing!! I loved almost every single second of this!! Nolan is going to be considered as one of the best directors of all-time now, and I will stand by and say, yes, I have to also agree. Check out my review here: http://dtmmr.wordpress.com/2010/07/19/inception-2010/

    Reply
    • Jul 19 2010

      1 more uh-mazing film from Nolan (to make 3 in a row) and I’d consider him to be on the level of the greats like Kubrick. Still, there’s no doubt he’s one of the best modern directors. (Although I wasn’t that happy with “The Prestige.”)

      Reply
  4. mcarteratthemovies
    Jul 20 2010

    “I believe a mark of a great film is open to question, interpretation and debate.”

    You are absolutely right, and this is what Christopher Nolan is very good at doing — in “The Dark Knight,” in “Memento,” in “The Prestige.” He takes you into these mazes and lets you figure your own way out.

    We seem to agree on what most other reviewers don’t: that “Inception” engages us intellectually AND emotionally. Cotillard’s character is the most sympathetic, with DiCaprio not far behind. Watanabe, though we know little about him, is intense and also, in some way, a little sad. I think Nolan did a bang-up job creating characters a whole lot more captivating than they had any right to be.

    And Simon/Ripley couldn’t be more right about the sexual tension between Tom Hardy and Joseph Gordon-Levitt. Could there be another “Brokeback”-styled matchup in the future? Lord I hope so.

    Reply
    • Jul 20 2010

      Crossing my fingers for a TH/JGL match-up in the future. I loved that small gun/big gun scene. Metaphor much? Haha.

      Reply
  5. Jul 24 2010

    I find it quite interesting that most discussions / debate about this film is the very last scene. Was it reality or dream? I focused more on the idea that the movie itself performed inception on us, so to say. It planted the idea in our head of this uncertainty. For the most part, we followed the levels of reality the characters went through and “knew” what parts were reality. But the fact that the movie ended with the top still spinning implanted the idea and lead us to question our own certainty. I think that concept took this film to an even greater level.

    Lol you know that I’m not a film critique and I appreciate most movies I see, but I’ve got to say that this is a top favorite of mine. Maybe because it does play in the field we are interested in =) yay psychology haha

    Reply

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Note: HTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to comments

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 991 other followers